PREPARING FOR A BIRD FLU PANDEMIC
How
Individuals Can Prepare – Alternatives to Tamiflu,
Prescription and Non-Prescription Antivirals,
Immune System Strength and Cytokine Storm,
Body Acid-Alkaline Balance, Vitamin C,
Stockpiling Food, and Other Issues
|
Article
Update Alarming News About Tamiflu Resistance A recent report in the New England Journal of Medicine by Jeremy Farrar at Oxford University states that the H5N1 bird flu virus in the bloodstream of two patients in Vietnam rapidly developed resistance to Tamiflu. One patient appeared to be stable at first and then rapidly worsened as the virus mutated, and eventually died. The clinicians reported that the resistant form of bird flu developed in two of the eight patients being treated with Tamiflu. One of the two patients was treated at an early stage of infection, when Tamiflu is supposed to be most effective. Medical experts and pandemic preparedness officials are dismayed and very concerned over these developments. The doctors reporting in the New England Journal of Medicine Article are urging changes to the global plans for fighting a flu pandemic, saying that other antiviral drugs are needed alongside Tamiflu. An eminent professor at Cornell University in New York calls the report "frightening" in a commentary in the journal. Anne Moscona, from the department of pediatrics, microbiology and immunology at Weill medical college, says Tamiflu-resistant H5N1 "is now a reality", and calls for efforts to prevent individuals stockpiling the drug. Its misuse, she says - by people who, for instance, take too low a dose - will breed resistance and further undermine its effectiveness if a pandemic sweeps the world. Information on Tamiflu alternatives is contained in the body of the original article below.
|
|
Article
Update New in this November 2005
update is the latest information on possible H5N1 Tamiflu resistance,
wild bird flu migration to Europe and possibly Canada, more complete
information on homeopathic flu remedies, acid-alkaline balance, the
potential for high dose vitamin C therapy for flu treatment, and a
warning from one of the U.S.’s foremost influenza experts, Dr. Michael
Osterholm, on the importance of stockpiling food for pandemic
preparedness. The updated article in October 2005 provided new information on the potential effectiveness of both prescription and non-prescription antiviral medications, including alternatives to Tamiflu. |
by
Stephanie Pierson1
|
Introduction and Background What can the average person do, if
anything, to prepare for the possibility of a global flu pandemic? There
are many things that can be done to prepare ahead of time, and this
article will discuss some options as well as guide the reader to
additional resources. This article is not meant to instill fear or panic
in readers. It is meant to let readers know that despite the dire
predictions abounding in the news, there are measures that individuals
can take to prepare themselves and their families at home in the event
of a global flu pandemic. Some may still wonder if it is worth
preparing for a flu pandemic. By this time most have heard of the H5N1
avian influenza virus endemic to southeast Asia, and the fact that
migrating birds have carried the virus to Europe. But many assume that
in the end it will be similar to the SARS virus, which quickly fizzled
out with very few cases occurring in the United States.
The reality of the situation, however,
is that the H5N1 flu virus is not like the SARS virus (SARS was a
coronavirus, not a flu virus), and there is a good chance that
eventually, probably sooner rather than later, this virus or one like it
will cause a global flu pandemic that may result in millions of deaths
worldwide. Our government agencies will not be able to stop the virus
from entering the U.S. There are two major methods of fighting
influenza – vaccine and antiviral drugs. It is widely acknowledged that
a working H5N1 vaccine will most likely not be ready in time for the
first wave of pandemic infection. There are many reasons for this, chief
of which is the fact that the final genetic makeup of the pandemic
strain will not be known until the pandemic actually begins, at which
point it will take at least six months to manufacture the first batches
of vaccine. Currently the U.S. is testing a vaccine based on the present
H5N1 virus circulating in Southeast Asia; however, it is unknown how
good a match this vaccine will be against the final pandemic strain,
since H5N1 is continuing to evolve. Additionally, vaccine production
facilities worldwide are very limited, and there are no production
facilities in the United States.
The other flu fighting approach is the
use of antiviral medications. It is already known that there are not
nearly enough doses of effective prescription antiviral drugs to go
around during a pandemic. It is assumed, but unproven, that these drugs
will be somewhat effective against H5N1, but much is still unknown about
the dose and duration of treatment that will work. Worrisome also is the
fact that recent reports indicate that the H5N1 virus has shown
resistance to Tamiflu, which up until now was presumed to be the most
effective antiviral drug available. In addition to prescription
antivirals there are also non-prescription antiviral medications and
other medicinal substances that have been shown to be effective in
clinical trials against human influenza, and these might be effective
against H5N1 also. Why is this flu virus so different and
capable of causing so much more harm than ordinary flu? It is because
this virus, unlike the usual flu viruses that we see every winter, has
never been seen before in humans (prior to 1997) and therefore no one on
earth has any type of acquired immunity to it. Bird or avian flu viruses
are so named because they begin in birds and then mutate to be able to
infect humans. They then further mutate to the point where they are
capable of human-to-human transmission.
The last major devastating global flu
pandemic in 1918 was caused by the H1N1 virus and it is estimated that
50-100 million people died worldwide.2
If the current H5N1 virus has roughly
the same mortality rate as the 1918 virus, then with today’s population
figures that would translate to 1.7 million deaths in the United States
and 180 million to 360 million deaths worldwide.3
Evidence so far suggests that a pandemic
caused by the current H5N1 flu is more likely to mimic the 1918 pandemic
mortality rate than other milder pandemics that occurred last century.4
The 1918 pandemic was especially cruel
in the way it killed many who were healthy and in the prime of life,
with more than half the deaths occurring among healthy adults between 18
and 40 years old.5
The flu viruses that we see every winter are rarely fatal to healthy
adults with adequate immune systems. These flu viruses generally kill
indirectly, mainly through opportunistic secondary infections such as
pneumonia. People with weakened immune systems such as the elderly and
chronically ill are the most susceptible to death from this type of
secondary infection. In the 1918 pandemic, however, the H1N1 virus
apparently caused many deaths directly, rather than indirectly, through
a process called cytokine storm.5
A cytokine storm occurs when the immune system goes into overdrive and
releases an avalanche of immune responders including cytokines and other
immune cells. This too great immune response overwhelms and inflames the
lungs, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with
eventual death by suffocation. It appears that cytokine storm is also
playing a major role in the H5N1 deaths in Southeast Asia today.6
The majority of H5N1 deaths to
date have been in children and young adults. A May 2005 article in the
New England Journal of Medicine entitled “Preparing for the Next
Pandemic” includes the nearby graphic of the mechanism of cytokine
storm.3
In early November 2005 the U.S. released
the avian flu pandemic national preparedness plan. This plan included funds for vaccines and medications, and
the provision for possible quarantines and travel restrictions. However,
Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center
for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, and one of the foremost flu
preparedness experts in the world, said in recent interviews that once the avian flu begins to
exhibit easy human transmission capabilities then it will be too late
for vaccines and antiviral drugs.
He said that the flu will move too quickly for drugs and vaccines
to be of much use and “ It doesn’t matter if we have a vaccine now or not. We can’t make
it .“ He also expressed
grave concerns that hospitals will be overwhelmed, and that there would
be massive food shortages
because the food supply system
will be dysfunctional. He
advised people and communities to begin stockpiling food now.
He has also stated, upon returning from a trip to Southeast Asia,
that the flu induced cytokine storm is not something that even our
modern medical facilities can handle. He said that “cytokine storm even
under the best of conditions is extremely difficult.
I don’t care if you’re in the intensive care unit at Johns
Hopkins or the Mayo Clinic or in Hanoi.
It’s a very difficult clinical condition to manage.”
He also said that the U.S. would run out of needed medical
supplies almost overnight once the flu hits.
How far away is the avian flu pandemic?
The truth is that nobody knows for sure. H5N1 is spreading
quickly in birds, but slowly in humans.
News reports erroneously claim that only one or two cases of
verified human-to-human transmission have taken place; however,
scientists following flu events closely vigorously dispute that claim,
and instead say that there have been quite a few cases of human
transmission within extended family clusters.
This type of transmission is one mutation away from the type of
rapid human transmission that would be present during a global pandemic.
This fall wild birds infected with H5N1 have been found across
Europe. And in Canada very recently wild birds were found infected with
the H5 flu subtype, with tests currently being conducted to determine if
it is actually H5N1.
Experts in bird migratory patterns report that in the very near future
H5N1 will be carried to every corner of the globe by wild bird
migration. From Europe
migrating birds will spread the flu to Africa.
Also, in the spring of 2006 European migrating birds will
intermingle with North American migrating birds in the Artic Circle.
When these birds return to North America the flu will inevitably
spread in the U.S.
The good news is that there is still time for individuals to prepare.
And if a pandemic strikes, there is every likelihood that
individuals may have to rely the best they can on their own resources
and self-care.
Preparations for the Pandemic For the individual trying to
prepare in advance at home, it would be important to consider
preparations on at least three fronts:
It should be kept in mind also that the
CDC says that flu pandemics last longer than most other emergency
events, and that flu activity usually comes in “waves” of infection
separated by months.7
In the last century the second wave usually came 3 to 12 months after
the first wave. It has also been noted that the second wave can be more
devastating than the first wave. So individuals should bear that in mind
when making preparations, and not expend all resources on the first wave
alone. Antiviral Medications
What type of antiviral medications or
substances are available, and will they actually work against the H5N1
flu virus? It had been assumed until recently that some of the current
antiviral drugs, the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and
zanamivir (Relenza), would be effective against H5N1.
In recent weeks, however,
reports have emerged of patients with a Tamiflu resistant H5N1 virus.
There have been cases in Southeast Asia where patients were
treated with Tamiflu early in the course of the disease but still died.
Much is still unknown about the correct dosages, duration of treatment,
and eventual resistance levels to these drugs. No medication, either
prescription or non-prescription, has been tested in a clinical trial
for efficacy against H5N1 infection in humans, mainly because of the
small number of identified patients so far. But a search of the medical
literature does yield other research studies, case reports, and expert
opinions that shed some light on the potential for each drug or
substance to work against H5N1 infection in humans. These prescription
antivirals and non-prescription medications for which clinical research are
found are discussed below. When contemplating preparations
involving antiviral medications, two questions may enter the reader’s
mind. First, why not just wait until illness strikes and then go to the
doctor and get a prescription? In a pandemic situation this may not be
so easy. All antiviral medications must be started almost immediately
after the onset of symptoms (within first 36 hours) in order to be
effective. In a pandemic situation it may be difficult to get a medical
appointment in time, and in addition there will most likely not be
enough doses of antivirals to accommodate all flu victims. The second
question is why should anyone consider non-prescription antivirals when
the virus is as deadly as H5N1? The answer is that some of these
non-prescription medications may just work, having been clinically
studied and found to be effective against normal human influenza. And,
more importantly, they are readily available over-the-counter for home
storage (at least at the current writing). Each of the antivirals are
discussed below. When this article was originally
published in July 2005, it was still possible for individuals to obtain
any of these drugs discussed below.
The prescription antivirals were available in local pharmacies
and over the internet.
Since that time, it appears that U.S. physicians are reluctant to write
prescriptions for individuals wishing to prepare in advance, and
internet sources of these prescription medications are scarce and
expensive. None-the-less, information on the effectiveness of the
prescription antivirals is presented below.
At this writing, November 2005, the non-prescription medications
discussed below are still available at stores and on the internet.
Some of the online stores have begun to limit the quantities of
Sambucol in each order, however. Prescription Antiviral Drugs The four antiviral medications
prescribed in the U.S. are oseltamivir (Tamiflu), zanamivir (Relenza),
amantadine, and rimantadine. Tamiflu and Relenza are neuraminidase
inhibitors and they work, in simplified terms, by inhibiting a structure
on the surface of the virus and interfering with virus replication and
spreading. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that
Tamiflu be the drug that nations stockpile in preparation for a flu
pandemic.8
Relenza is effective also, however it is an inhaled drug which makes
administration difficult in patients in respiratory distress. Relenza
could be very useful as a prophylactic. It is estimated that the U.S.
has enough Tamiflu stockpiled to cover less than 1% of the population.
Tamiflu has been shown to be effective
against human influenza illness (not H5N1) with the duration of illness
being shortened by about 30 hours when the drug was administered within
the first 36 hours of illness.9
Another study showed that treatment begun within the first 12 hours of
illness onset is more effective than at 48 hours, so treatment with
Tamiflu needs to begin as soon as possible after infection.10
Bear in mind that these studies did not involve patients infected with
H5N1. Tamiflu has been shown to be effective
against H5N1 in mice, and a recent study using a current, very virulent
strain of H5N1 showed that mice survival was significantly increased
with 8 days of treatment instead of the standard 5 days.11
Case reports of H5N1 patients in Southeast Asia have also been published. These show that so far Tamiflu has not proven to be very effective in fighting actual H5N1 infection in humans; however, in most of the reported cases the drug was started later than the proven time period of effectiveness.12 13 14 The WHO reports that there have been a few cases of patient deaths when Tamiflu was started immediately, however.15 Physicians treating these patients have recommended that Tamiflu be started as soon as H5N1 infection is suspected, and that duration of treatment be extended to longer than the standard 5 day course. Reports from Southeast Asia also warn of atypical presentations of the disease (diarrhea and coma) that may make diagnosis and early treatment difficult.16 Zanamivir, brand name Relenza, works in
the same way as Tamiflu and is probably equally effective. It has been
shown to be effective in fighting human influenza (not H5N1), decreasing
the duration of illness by about 24 hours.17
Several studies have shown Relenza to be effective against H5N1 in mice
and in vitro.18
19 20
The downside to Relenza is the fact that it is only available as an
inhaled drug, however, this would not affect its usefulness as a
prophylactic. Like Tamiflu, it is expensive and in limited supply. Both Tamiflu and Relenza were thought to be less likely to become resistant to the virus than the older antivirals on the market; however, according to the WHO a resistant variant of H5N1 has been recently detected in several patients treated with Tamiflu.15 The fact that Tamiflu resistance has been seen in H5N1 patients already indicates that resistance may become any even bigger problem than anticipated as the pandemic progresses. It has also been reported that general viral resistance to Tamiflu has been growing in Japan, where it is routinely prescribed to fight common flu. Countries may have to alter their pandemic antiviral stockpiling plans in case Tamiflu resistance increases. The two older antiviral drugs in the
U.S. market are amantadine and its sister drug rimantadine. According to
the CDC and WHO, both of these drugs were tested in vitro against the
strain of H5N1 circulating in Southeast Asia and found to be
ineffective.7
The resistance of H5N1 to these drugs has been blamed on their
veterinary use in Southeast Asian countries. It is alleged that in China
these drugs have been sold cheaply to farmers and given to poultry both
as a treatment and prophylactic since the 1990’s; however, no firm link
between China’s use of the drug and resistance to amantadine has been
established.21
Based on these studies showing H5N1’s resistance to amantadine, many
experts and officials have eliminated amantadine and rimantadine from
serious consideration for use in a pandemic. There are some reports
emerging, however, that the H5N1 found in birds in both Qinghai province
China, as well as Russia is indeed sensitive to amantadine.22
23
If these reports are verified then public health officials may need to
rethink their usage in a pandemic. Amantadine and rimantadine are
cheaper and more readily available then Tamiflu and Relenza. Non-prescription Antiviral
Medications Several non-prescription medications
have been subjected to clinical trials in order to gauge their
effectiveness against normal human influenza (not H5N1). These are
Sambucol, a proprietary medication made from an extract of black
elderberries that was developed by an Israeli virologist, and
resveratrol, a naturally occurring compound found in grape skins and
other plant sources which is extracted and sold by various manufacturers
under various brand names in the U.S. Also in the non-prescription realm
are homeopathic remedies, in particular Oscillococcinum, which is a
medicine specific for influenza treatment. Clinical trials have also
been conducted on the efficacy of this treatment for human influenza. A note of caution is in order regarding
all non-prescription medications and substances that may be touted as
cold and flu remedies and as general immune boosters. It may be
advisable to use with caution any substance that is advertised as having
immune boosting properties without any proven antiviral mechanism. The
reason for this is that boosting the immune system alone may actually
put the patient more at risk for cytokine storm, since cytokine storm is
essentially the overreaction of a strong immune system. The prescription
antiviral drugs on the market work by interfering with viral structures,
not by simply boosting the immune system. The non-prescription
medications (Sambucol and resveratrol) discussed below have demonstrated
antiviral properties. But some non-prescription substances on the
market, such as Echinacea and many others, are primarily immune system
boosters and therefore should be viewed with caution.
On the other hand, some researchers
speculate that boosting the immune system prior to flu infection would
actually be beneficial, because then in theory the total viral load
carried by the individual would be lower and the immune system might
more effectively fight the virus and cytokine storm might never occur.
It can’t be emphasized enough just how speculative these hypotheses are
right now. Perhaps the safest rule of thumb should be to exercise
caution with non-prescription medicinal substances, and if possible
choose among those that have proven antiviral properties, such as the
substances discussed below.
Sambucol Sambucol is a non-prescription
proprietary medication made from an extract of black elderberries by an
Israeli company, and marketed in the U.S. It was developed by Israeli
virologist Madeleine Mumcuoglu. An in vitro study showed that Sambucol
neutralized the hemagglutinin spike on the flu viruses and inhibited
viral replication.24
Two separate randomized double blind control trials of the efficacy of
Sambucol against human influenza showed that the Sambucol treated group
had a duration of illness about 4 days shorter than the placebo group.24
25
These results show that Sambucol actually decreases illness duration
more than the prescription antivirals on the market.
Sambucol has also been shown to raise
cytokine levels in a scientific study using healthy humans.26
It may be that Sambucol has two
mechanisms for fighting normal flu and cold viruses – a direct antiviral
action as well as an immune boosting action.. These studies involved flu
patients experiencing normal human influenza, not H5N1, of course, and
in normal human influenza the possibility of cytokine storm is not
usually considered an issue. Will Sambucol work against the H5N1
virus? No one knows for sure, but there is the possibility that its
antiviral activity would be very helpful, even though it does also
appear to raise cytokine levels somewhat. It may also be a good
preventative and might be useful for helping people reduce their total
viral load before they are exposed. And if no Tamiflu is available, or
if H5N1 becomes even more resistant to Tamiflu, then it probably would
not hurt to try Sambucol. Sambucol is available in health food
stores and on the internet. As of this writing some of the online stores
are beginning to place limits on the number of bottles of Sambucol per
order, which probably means people are beginning to stockpile it. An
online check found a low price of around $12.89 for the 7.9 oz size.
Sambucol comes in both sugar and sugar-free formulas, in liquid and
lozenge, and also with Echinacea. It may be a good idea to buy Sambucol
without the Echinacea, since Echinacea is thought to raise cytokine
levels and does not have a proven direct antiviral mechanism of its own.
As has been stressed before, no one knows for sure what will work
against H5N1 and what the effective dosages might be. Resveratrol
Another non-prescription substance with
potential for fighting H5N1 is resveratrol. Resveratrol is a natural
compound found in the skins of grapes, wines, peanuts, and a few other
plant sources. There is research showing that resveratrol has antiviral
effects against human influenza. In a recent study at the University of
Milan, researchers found that resveratrol could stop the replication of
the influenza virus in cell cultures.27
These researchers also gave resveratrol to mice that had been infected
with the influenza virus and found a 40% increased survival rate
compared to controls. Also significant, they report that resveratrol
acts by inhibiting a cellular (host) function, rather than just a viral
function, and because of this could be a particularly valuable antiviral
influenza drug due to the fact that it would be difficult for resistance
to develop, and also it would be effective regardless of the invading
virus’s type, strain, or antigenic properties. They also believe that
resveratrol increases survival by two mechanisms, both an inhibition of
viral replication and a reduction in inflammatory cytokine levels. Along
these lines other studies have found that resveratrol has significant
anti-inflammatory and cytokine inhibiting properties.28
Given these latest research findings
that resveratrol has both direct antiviral and cytokine and inflammation
reducing properties, it certainly could be worth investigating. No
studies have been done, of course, of effectiveness against the H5N1
virus. There are also no guidelines in this regard for dosage and length
of treatment. Resveratrol is manufactured from a
variety of plant sources under several brand names. It is probably
important that the consumer makes sure that an independent laboratory
has verified that a product has the amount of the active ingredient that
it claims it does. Some people may prefer to try to obtain
their resveratrol by drinking red wine and eating grapes, raisins,
peanuts, and peanut butter, which are all natural sources of the
substance. Much caution should be exercised in using this approach,
however. The levels of resveratrol found in grape products varies
considerably, but an individual would most likely have to consume quite
a bit of these foods to obtain a significant amount. Peanut products
contain even less resveratrol than grapes, and many people have a mild
food allergy to peanuts which may not become apparent until large
quantities are consumed regularly. Too much wine, grapes, and raisins on
a regular basis can raise blood sugar levels in many people.
Wine on a regular basis can also put the
body out of the proper acid/alkaline balance, as will be discussed
further in the next section. The end result of attempting to get
resveratrol through large quantities of food and drink could be a
weakening of the immune system over time if this induces allergies,
blood sugar fluctuations, or pH imbalance. More study is needed in this
area but for now caution is warranted. Homeopathic Medicines
Homeopathy is a form of medicine that is over two hundred years
old, and is based upon the theory of “like cures like”. There are tens
of thousands of homeopathic practitioners all over the world, many of
them also physicians also trained in conventional medicine.
A homeopathic remedy is
an extremely dilute quantity of a substance that is deemed to have
similar properties to the condition or illness of the patient. With
homeopathic medicines, the more dilute the concentration, the more
potent it is. This is
sometimes very hard for practitioners of conventional medicine to
understand, especially since in the very dilute concentrations there is
not even one molecule left of the original substance. The nearest
familiar comparison would be to modern vaccines. Regardless of how they
work, homeopathic medicines have been proven to be significantly better
than placebo in randomized double blind control clinical trials, which
indicates that there must be something to them, even though they are
extremely dilute. At times they
have been called “vibrational” medicines.
Homeopaths claim a long history of
successfully treating the flu, including the 1918 flu.
According to Randall Neustaedter in his book “Flu: Alternative
Treatments and Prevention”, many patients in the U.S. had access to
homeopathic care during the 1918 pandemic.
In a report to the American Institute of Homeopathy in 1921, the
dramatic success of homeopathic flu treatment was documented.
According to this report, the death rate for 24,000 flu cases
under conventional medical care was 28.2 percent, while the death rate
for 26,000 cases treated with homeopathy was 1.05 percent.
According to this report, many homeopathic physicians each
reported treating thousands of patients with very few deaths.
No information is available on
exactly how these cure rates were derived, and if they would meet modern
statistical standards. There are however, modern clinical
trials that have tested the effectiveness of homeopathic remedies for
flu against placebo. Researchers at the Cochrane Collaboration conducted
a meta-analysis of the data from seven controlled trials in order to see
if Oscillococcinum and other homeopathic remedies were effective in
preventing or treating human influenza illness.29
Oscillococcinum is made from wild duck heart and liver, which are said
to be reservoirs for influenza virus. The
authors concluded that the when used in treatment, Oscillococcinum and
similar homeopathic remedies reduced the duration of illness by .28
days. The medicine also increased the chance that the patient considered
the treatment effective, compared to the patients treated with a
placebo. The authors found no evidence, however, that homeopathic
remedies are effective in preventing influenza illness. They conclude by
stating that they can’t recommend homeopathic medicines as a first line
defense against influenza based on the data at hand; however, they feel
the results are promising and more research is warranted.
A reduction in illness duration of just .28 days may not seem
like much, however it should be remembered that the best prescription
antivirals only reduce illness duration by about 1 day.
Other controlled trials not included in the Cochrane review have
also shown that homeopathic medicines are effective against the flu. In his book Neustaedter says that
homeopaths treat patients with a variety of homeopathic medicines;
however he says:
He
also tells us that the epidemic medicine for the 1918 flu was Gelsemium,
with Bryonia and Eupatorium as secondary prescriptions. He also mentions
that a homeopathic medication named Influenzinum is prepared each year
from the flu virus strains recommended by the WHO for the year’s vaccine
production. What does all this mean for the average
reader with no knowledge of homeopathy?
And will homeopathic practitioners rely solely on homeopathic
remedies during an H5N1 pandemic?
After all, there were no modern antiviral medicines available in
1918, so no comparison could be made at that time between antiviral drug
therapy and homeopathic flu therapy.
If one is interested in investigating homeopathic flu treatment,
then one should educate oneself a little on the methods and principles
ahead of time, and if possible find and get to know a good homeopathic
practitioner. There are many books and free online materials available
on the subject. Unlike most
other medications, in homeopathic medicines the more dilute the
substance the higher the potency. Also, the medicines are given in a
certain way, they are not administered on a regular, timed schedule for
a set number of days, as for instance antibiotic therapy is
administered. At the very least, anyone interested in homeopathic therapy for H5N1 should have the medicines stored at home ahead of time, along with some downloaded information from the internet on their usage for flu treatment. Since Neustaedter in his book says that Gelsemium and Bryonia have been the two most frequently indicated flu remedies over the past 100 years, it would make sense to stock those two, as well as Eupatorium, which he also mentions as being used during the 1918 flu. It would also seem logical to stock some Oscillococcinum, as that has been clinically tested and found to be effective in decreasing flu illness duration. All of these medicines are extremely cheap and can be found at health food stores and online. Gelsemium, Bryonia, and Eupatorium from the Boiron company are under $8 for 100 pellets in the 200c strength. Oscillococcinum is slightly more expensive, but can readily be found in health food stores and even some drug stores. As a start, the reader could visit the online article, Homeopathy and the Flu, which contains an excerpt from Neustaedter’s book describing the homeopathic treatment of flu and the contrasting indications for Gelsemium and Bryonia. Remember, consulting a homeopathic practitioner is always best,
however in a flu pandemic situation self treatment may become a
necessity. If it becomes
impossible to actually visit a homeopath for treatment during a
pandemic, then it may be possible to consult one over the phone or self
treat from books and online literature, if the remedies are stored at
home ahead of time.
And it may not be wise to rely on
homeopathic treatment alone, especially if it looks like cytokine storm
is a danger. If it is not
possible to obtain any conventional medical treatment, then in addition
to homeopathic medicine the reader should consider the non-prescription
antivirals discussed in the previous section, as well as intensive
vitamin C therapy, discussed in the next section. Vitamin C Much has been written about the
usefulness of vitamin C for both antibacterial and antiviral purposes,
and very large doses of vitamin C may have a role in fighting an H5N1flu
infection. However, the amount of vitamin C needed by the body to
overcome infection may be extremely large, even as much as 100,000 grams
or more in an eight hour period. It has been suggested by experts in the
usage of vitamin C that at the first sign of influenza infection the
patient should begin taking oral vitamin C to “bowel tolerance”.
This would mean taking 1000 - 4000 mg of vitamin C per hour until
bowels become loose. At
that point the vitamin C dose should be maintained or decreased slightly
until the bowels normalize. Vitamin C experts say that often, until a
certain dosage threshold is reached, no improvement at all is noted, and
then all of a sudden the patient will improve very rapidly.
Once the virus is overwhelmed, then a far lower dose will cause
loose stools. It is also possible to administer intravenous vitamin C;
however, in a self treatment situation this option would not exist. It would probably be wise to have a
large quantity of vitamin C on hand to function as an adjunct to other
antiviral medication and/or homeopathic therapy.
At the first sign of infection vitamin C could be started along
with one or more antiviral medications.
One source of inexpensive high quality bulk Vitamin C powder
(ascorbic acid crystals) is from a company called
VitaPurity.
Their
Buffered Vitamin C
powder can be mixed with water, juice, or mixed in applesauce. Hydrogen Peroxide And finally in the arena of somewhat
controversial flu fighters there is hydrogen peroxide. There is
considerable anecdotal evidence from people who have tried it that
hydrogen peroxide drops in the ears works successfully to fight cold and
flu if taken at the onset of symptoms. One can find unsubstantiated
information on the internet that in 1928 a doctor named Richard Simmons
hypothesized that cold and flu viruses actually entered the body through
the ear canal, not just the nose and mouth. Hence the rationale for
putting hydrogen peroxide drops in the ear canal. There is more
unsubstantiated information on the internet that in the 1930’s German
doctors had success with treating cold and flu patients with hydrogen
peroxide.
In the case of H5N1 infection it would
probably not be a good idea to forego antiviral therapy for hydrogen
peroxide therapy, if antivirals were available. If no antivirals are
available, however, then hydrogen peroxide drops may be worth trying. It
is also possible that hydrogen peroxide drops could be used as a
preventative or in conjunction with antiviral therapy.
A bottle of 3% hydrogen peroxide can be
found in the drug store for around $3.00. This type of peroxide should
not be taken orally, and should be stored out of sunlight to avoid
degradation. There is also a type of food grade hydrogen peroxide that
is available on the internet that is meant to be taken orally for
various health reasons. There is some controversy over the safety of
consuming hydrogen peroxide orally though, so anyone attempting this
should be careful and research it well. There are some very thorough
books on the subject, such as “Hydrogen Peroxide, Medical Miracle,” by
William Douglass, MD.
Maintaining Optimal Body Health –
Acid/Alkaline Balance In some ways the idea of preparing for a
flu pandemic by maintaining optimal health ahead of time seems like a
contradiction to the previous section where the problem of cytokine
storm killing some of the healthiest people was discussed. It would seem
logical that if this type of flu were especially dangerous to people
with the healthiest immune systems, then trying to improve health ahead
of time may not be the best idea.
Again, this is a very uncertain area,
and no one knows the answers. But it should also be remembered that in
any disease pandemic there are always those who never get sick or who
only have a mild infection and recover quickly. In southeast Asia right
now it is thought that there are many asymptomatic H5N1 carriers, and
many others who have probably had a mild case and recovered on their
own.
What is the difference between those
that get very sick and those that don’t, when to begin with no one on
Earth actually had an acquired immunity? There are many factors that
could come into play, such as some form of natural immunity and genetic
differences, however one very possible answer to the age old question of
why some people get sick and others don’t is the pH balance of the body
– the alkaline/acid balance. The Edgar Cayce readings shed much light
on this subject. In the Cayce readings the importance of maintaining the
correct acid/alkaline balance in the body was discussed time and time
again. The Cayce readings said that when the correct balance is
maintained, which is about 80% alkaline, then the body would not be
susceptible to any communicable disease. In short, a properly pH
balanced body does not provide a hospitable environment for cold and flu
germs.
When during a reading Cayce was asked
“What causes colds? Can you give me a formula or method of preventing
them, or curing them?” Cayce responded: “Keep the body alkaline!
Cold germs do not live in an alkaline system! They do breed in any acid
or excess of acids of any character left in the system.” [1947-4] Is there any scientific evidence that
would back up the Cayce readings on this subject?
David McMillin in his paper “Diet
and Urinary PH: A Preliminary Study and Brief Discussion of Relevance to
Infectious Disease”, notes studies that show that many viruses
infect host cells by fusing with the cell membrane at low pH.
Thus, a mildly acidic environment is required for optimal
infectivity of such pH-dependent viruses. He notes also that drugs that
increase intracellular pH (alkalinity) have been shown to decrease
infectivity of rhinovirus. He also notes that the antimicrobial effects
of many substances are pH-dependent.
So, it would appear indeed that there is
some scientific evidence backing up the theory that a properly balanced
body pH does not provide a hospitable environment for cold and flu
germs. Even more remarkable is the Cayce
reading in which a 23 year old woman in 1935 who was traveling out of
the country asked Cayce whether she should submit to travel vaccinations
for infectious diseases. Cayce said
“So far as the body-physical condition is
concerned, the adherence to the use of carrots, lettuce, and celery
every day at a meal or as a portion of the meal will insure against any
contagious forces with which the body may be in contact.” “As indicated,
if an alkalinity is maintained in the system – especially with lettuce,
carrots, and celery, these in the blood supply will maintain such a
condition as to immunize a person”
[480-19]
One of the reasons that lettuce,
carrots, and celery are very beneficial to the body is because they are
very alkalizing. Many nutritionally conscious people have
heard of the importance of maintaining the correct acid/alkaline
balance, but have avoided learning more and attempting to do it because
they fear it will be too difficult and complicated and involve knowing
about chemistry. But maintaining a reasonably good pH balance is not
that difficult. One good book that covers the subject, as well as much
more of Edgar Cayce’s advice on food and nutrition is Simone Gabby’s
“Nourishing the Body Temple”. Lists of foods that are acid and alkaline
can also easily be found on the internet, along with discussions of how
to balance the diet in regard to pH.
Basically, most, but not all, fruits and
vegetables are alkalizing, while most meats, poultry, fish, dairy,
alcohol, grains, and sugars are acidifying. The trick is to try to eat
more fruits and vegetables and less grain products, meats, dairy,
sugars, alcohol and refined carbohydrates. The Cayce readings say to try
to keep an 80/20 alkaline/acid balance. Even taking the time to grab
some raw carrots and celery for a snack once a day can make a big
difference in body pH, especially if the intake of acidic foods is
limited. There are a few surprises in the reading's list of foods, such
as the information that black tea is acidic in the body, however coffee
is considered to actually have nutritional value, and when taken black
after a meal it is alkalizing. Taking the time to learn more about
balancing the body chemistry would not only help prepare the individual
for a flu pandemic but would also be very beneficial in general. William Hutton and his wife decided to
make a reserve "potion" of lettuce, celery, and carrots to have on hand
in the event of the sudden appearance of bird flu in their neighborhood,
and/or at a time when fresh vegetables were not easily available. This
was done by juicing the three vegetables and then freezing the liquid in
plastic ice-cube trays. This reserve is used by removing a number of the
ice cubes and eating them at suitable times each day. Such could be very
helpful to battle the first wave of a bird-flu, or any other flu virus
that comes along. The Cayce readings also mention a
substance called Glyco Thymoline, which is said to act as an aid in
restoring the body to its correct, slightly alkaline pH balance. Cecil
Nichols, in a paper prepared for the Medical Research Division of the
Edgar Cayce Foundation, titled "Glyco
Thymoline In The Edgar Cayce Readings", studied and reported on the
193 Cayce readings in which Glyco Thymoline was mentioned. The readings
recommended Glyco’s use as an internal antiseptic, to be used for
gargling, as a pack, and as an eye wash.
The readings vary in the amount of Glyco prescribed, but
generally small quantities, 3-10 drops in water, acts as “an alkalizer
for the alimentary canal”.
Many people today gargle with Glyco when they feel a cold or flu coming
on, and note that it often stops the infection from progressing. The
readings also caution against taking too much Glyco internally, for care
must be taken not to over alkalize the body.
It may be very worthwhile to have a
bottle of Glyco Thymoline on hand as one more weapon in the home
preparedness arsenal against H5N1.
At the first sign of infection, the patient can begin gargling
with Glyco, and it may also function well as a flu preventative.
Glyco Thymoline can be ordered from the Heritage Store at the
A.R.E. as well as many places online. Finally, it is also known that too much
stress will cause the body to become unbalanced with regard to pH. This
helps to explain why some people are more susceptible to colds and flu
when under duress.
Storing Food and Other Supplies Ahead of
Time There is a strong possibility that if
the world experienced another flu pandemic like the 1918 pandemic, life
would change dramatically for months or even years. It is likely that
many of the goods and services that we take for granted now would not be
so readily available. In the U.S. many stores are stocked with goods on
a daily or weekly basis, and if the supply line were disrupted then
stores would empty very quickly.
This phenomenon can already be seen in
areas of the country when the threat of severe weather approaches and
stores are quickly emptied by shoppers frantically trying to prepare. In
those cases though after the severe weather is over life quickly returns
to normal and trucks restock the stores immediately.
In a flu pandemic, however, the entire
supply line may be disrupted if many people fall ill and many other
people refuse to go to work for fear of falling ill. It makes sense then
for individuals to store some food and other supplies at home as part of
their overall preparations. This also makes great sense in general,
regardless of whether or not a flu pandemic ever materializes, for there
is always the possibility of other natural disasters or earth changes
for which one should be prepared. The Cayce readings discuss this quite
frequently, and The Hutton
Commentaries keeps readers well informed of the status of Earth
changes through his website and bulletins. Since this article was originally
published in July 2005, many of the recommendations found here for
storing food have been echoed by one of the leading flu and infectious
disease experts in the world, Dr. Michael Osterholm of the University of
Minnesota. As stated earlier in
the article, Dr. Osterholm has gone on record advising the U.S.
government that it is actually too late now to worry about stockpiling
antivirals and vaccines – what is needed now is for communities and
individuals to actually begin to stockpile food and other life
necessities. It should be a real wake up call to the
world for a dire warning like this to come from a mainstream scientist
like Dr. Osterholm. And
while it does not appear that governments are beginning to stockpile
food, there is still time for individuals to stockpile food and other
supplies at home. Also alarming is the decrease in
government stored food in the U.S. over time.
At one time the country had enough food in storage to feel every
man, woman, and child for a three year period.
Gradually our stores of grain and other food have been sold off
or given to other countries, until the point today when we are left with
about a 15 pound supply of food in storage for every person in the
country. And most of that
15 pounds is not very palatable – unprocessed wheat, peanut butter,
cheese products, etc. What kinds of food and supplies should
one stock and how much should be stocked? That is not an easy question
to answer, however there are many books and websites on the subject to
guide you. The Mormon religion has always instructed its followers to
store a year’s worth of food and supplies at home for use during
emergency. They have learned to do this very economically, by placing
large group orders with suppliers like
Walton Feed and
Mountain House Foods.
Another approach to food storage is to
simply buy and store a lot more of the food you normally eat anyway,
rotating the stored food into usage on a regular basis. For instance if
you like canned soups or jars of pasta sauce, simply buy and keep on
hand enough to last for weeks or months, and then rotate the stored food
into use. Large bags of rice can be bought at discount grocery stores
extremely cheaply, and if you never end up eating them it would not be a
huge financial loss. Don’t forget to think about the
acid/alkaline balance of foods for storage also. As discussed in a
previous section, one might consider making reserve potions of lettuce,
celery, and carrot juice to store in the freezer to have on hand for
supplying alkalinity, enzymes, and other nutrients that vegetables
supply. Another idea for
getting fresh food into the diet is making one's own sprouts.
This is relatively easy and cheap to do, but you should lay in
the seeds and sprouting supplies ahead of time. It is important to have access to a
supply of potable water. Stored water should be contained in glass or food-safe plastic
containers, and should have purifiers such as stabilized oxygen,
hydrogen peroxide, and chlorine drops added to keep it uncontaminated.
And of course any necessities that you couldn’t live without such as
prescription drugs should be thought about in advance. It would probably
be a good idea to have some cash on hand also.
Review and Conclusion Supplies to Get Ahead of Time:
Steps to take for Suspected H5N1
Infection
That about covers that main physical preparations that one can make at present for a possible global flu pandemic. Readers should weigh the information in this article carefully and make decisions and preparations as he or she feels guided. This article will be updated as new information becomes available. |
|
Disclaimer The information provided herein should not be construed as a health-care diagnosis, treatment regimen or any other prescribed health-care advice or instruction. The information is provided with the understanding that the author or web-publisher are not engaged in the practice of medicine or any other health-care profession and do not enter into a health-care practitioner/patient relationship with its readers. The author/publisher does not advise or recommend to its readers treatment or action with regard to matters relating to their health or well-being other than to suggest that readers consult appropriate health-care professionals in such matters. No action should be taken based solely on the content of this article. The information and opinions provided herein are believed to be accurate and sound at the time of publication, based on the best judgment available to the author. However, readers who rely on information in this publication to replace the advice of health-care professionals, or who fail to consult with health-care professionals, assume all risks of such conduct. The author/publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions. |
Page Created: October 3, 2005
Last Updated:
April 25, 2006
Contact: William Hutton
Webmaster: Jonathan Eagle
Copyright 2005, E.R.A. Inc. All Rights Reserved